Every launch on Pons gets a grade from A to F, built only from what the chain shows: how much the deployer kept, whether they sold, who bought in the launch window — and who paid for those wallets. Each finding links the transaction behind it.
| Age | Ticker | Token | Amplitude | Buyers | ETH in | Sniped | Graduated | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No launches past the threshold yet. The station is listening· | ||||||||
Pons announces every launch on chain. The station is listening within seconds, not minutes.
TokenLaunched
Who bought, how fast, and which wallets Pons itself charged the launch-window snipe tax.
CurveBuy · SnipeTaxCharged
Each early buyer is traced back to the wallet that sent it its first ETH. A shared unnamed funder is one person with several wallets.
activity-summary
Weights are published and fixed. Anything that could not be measured is dropped, never counted against the token.
seven measurements
How much of what people actually hold sits with the deployer.
Whether the deployer sold on the curve at all.
Only measured once enough supply has left the curve to mean anything.
Pons marks launch-window snipers itself. This is its number, not ours.
Bundles. Wallets funded through a bridge do not count — that is a bridge, not a bundle.
Serial deployers are visible; one launch is not a pattern.
Not asked of a launch too young to have got there.
Nothing here is a prediction or a recommendation. A clean grade describes how a launch was set up, not what it will do. Not financial advice.
No account or deployer is labelled. The site states what happened and links the transaction; the word for it is yours, not ours. That rule is enforced in code — a finding containing a judgement word is refused before it can be published.
Trades inside a Uniswap v4 pool and tokens moved by transfer are outside what a curve reading can see. Where that changes a number, the report says so instead of guessing.